
US x Iran peace deal before Trump visits China?
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Iran and the United states agree to a permanent peace deal before Donald Trump visits China. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If neither a qualifying peace deal nor a Trump visit to China occurs by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No". A permanent peace deal refers to any agreement which explicitly indicates that military hostilities between the United States and Iran have ended or will permanently cease, or uses equivalent language clearly signaling a lasting end to military hostilities between the United States and Iran. Agreements that are explicitly temporary or which do not include a definitive agreement to end military hostilities between the US and Iran on a lasting basis (e.g. a temporary extension of the two-week ceasefire agreement announced on April 7, 2026), will not qualify. A qualifying agreement will be considered to have been established if either of the following conditions are met: - The United States and Iran each sign or formally adopt a written agreement (e.g. a treaty or multi-point agreement) which meets the above criteria. - Both the governments of the United States and Iran provide clear public confirmation that a qualifying agreement has been definitively established. Negotiations, statements of progress, or other statements which do not constitute a definitive announcement that a qualifying agreement has been reached will not count. The primary resolution source for whether a peace deal is achieved will be official information from the governments of the United States and Iran; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used. For the purpose of this market, a "visit" is defined as Trump physically entering the terrestrial or maritime territory of the listed country. Whether or not Trump enters the country's airspace during the timeframe of this market will have no bearing on a positive resolution. The primary resolution source for Trump visiting China will be official information from government of the United States of America and official information from Trump or released by his verified social media accounts (e.g. https://twitter.com/POTUS); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Probabilidad histórica
¿Es rentable apostar?
AplastanteResultado casi cantado: No al 100%. La apuesta segura paga poco (+0.15 USD por 100). El valor real puede estar en el lado contrario si crees que la sorpresa es posible.
Mejor perfil riesgo/retorno
Sí
+66566.67 USD / 100
Sí
Evitar0.1% · 666.67x
/100
+66566.67
- Probabilidad ínfima (0.1%). Pagarías muy poco pero la chance de acertar es casi nula.
No
Evitar99.9% · 1.00x
/100
+0.15
- Casi seguro (99.9%). El retorno es despreciable: ganarías sólo 0.15 USD por 100 apostados.
Si confías en el mercado, todas las apuestas tienen el mismo valor esperado. La rentabilidad real depende de si crees que el mercado se equivoca. Aquí valoramos el perfil de riesgo y el retorno potencial.
Resumen con IA
Genera un análisis natural del partido a partir del precio, volumen y movimiento reciente. Pulsa el botón para crearlo — así sólo consume tokens cuando lo pides.
Por qué esta probabilidad
Consenso muy fuerte: el mercado da 0% al resultado.
Consenso muy fuerte
0% de probabilidad refleja un consenso muy fuerte entre los traders.
Tendencia semanal a la baja
Hace una semana cotizaba al 7%, ahora 0% (−6.3 puntos).
Precio estable
Las últimas operaciones se han movido en un rango muy estrecho, señal de que los traders comparten estimación.
Liquidez adecuada
85,68 mil US$ en órdenes asegura que el precio refleja muchas posiciones.
Análisis automático generado a partir del precio, volumen, liquidez y movimiento reciente. Las probabilidades reflejan lo que el conjunto de traders cree, no un pronóstico oficial.
Liquidez suficiente para confiar en el precio. Aun así, una probabilidad alta no garantiza el resultado: un 80% falla 1 de cada 5 veces.